By Boris Berenfeld and Robert Tinker
There is a disturbing tendency to treat educational materials as building blocks that can be assembled in any convenient order. "Knowledge engineers" think they can start with "learning objects" that can be automatically assembled into meaningful instruction.
Such designs ignore the central role of sequences of content and the importance of the progressive integration of ideas that creates knowledge and expertise. Core content needs to be returned to again and again, with each encounter deepening student understanding and increasing the web of associations that is a critical attribute of true knowledge.
At each step, a curriculum designer must consider what the student already knows, what misconceptions are likely, what can be learned now, and what is important for subsequent steps. This need not preclude inquiry, but is required to make learning of key ideas and processes successful.
Creating a coherent progression in science areas that are changing is particularly challenging. For instance, advances in molecular science in general and in molecular biology in particular are happening so rapidly that simply memorizing the tenets of yesterday no longer ensures true fluency in the field. Even biology's vaunted Central Dogma (DNA codes RNA, which codes proteins)—a cross between classical genetics and modern molecular science—is showing cracks. To truly understand new advances in molecular biology, students need molecular literacy that includes understanding the molecular concepts underlying the constructs of modern biology and the ability to apply these concepts to various biological phenomena.
Yet literacy in any field, particularly in molecular science, cannot be taught by treating curriculum components as building blocks assembled in any order. Proper sequencing that guides students to construct a rich molecular worldview useful for explaining a wide range of phenomena is critical.
In the traditional biology curriculum, molecular science is presented in a fragmented way, highlighting limited concepts. Most, if not all, ninth grade biology textbooks include a section typically entitled "The Chemistry of Life." Students are introduced to atoms, ions, and small molecules. This chapter traditionally includes a colorful picture of water molecules, with dotted lines between them referred to as hydrogen bonds. Another picture shows sodium and chloride ions attracted into a crystalline structure due to opposite charges carried by the ions, though this may create a misconception that attractions exist only between ions. There is nothing or very little about polarity or van der Waals forces.
In the "Chemistry of Life" chapter, macromolecules come next. Here carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids are introduced. Students memorize the four nucleotides—A, C, G, and T—that make up DNA, look up the chemical formulas of 20 amino acids capable of combining into polypeptide chains, and learn that proteins have primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures.
To address the genetic code, such a chapter has a table linking 64 possible triplets of nucleotides to 20 amino acids. As the finale, it mentions that when DNA code is translated into proteins, the proteins determine traits. Since Mendelian genetics usually comes much later in the course, students cannot question at this point how traits are linked with proteins. A couple of months later, by the time they study Mendel's Laws, "The Chemistry of Life" looks like a distant and disconnected mirage.
While this approach refers to atomic-scale interactions, it doesn't develop the connections necessary to build a strong understanding or reasoning skill at the molecular level. Because many critical molecular principles underlying these ideas had been considered hard to teach, they were often skipped, lightly touched upon, or taught quantitatively through mathematics. But unless students were mathematically literate, this was not an effective approach.
With the support of the National Science Foundation, we have developed a sequence of model-based activities to support student understanding of key concepts that underpin modern biology. The Stepping Stones to Molecular Literacy helps students reason about microscopic and macroscopic phenomena using what they learn about atoms, molecules and their interactions, and the resulting emergent phenomena. The specific sequence is critical because each activity builds upon the ones before it. Like Russian nesting dolls, each activity encompasses the prior ones, thus building a progression of molecular understanding.
The following is an example of a model-based progression of activities. (For the complete list of The Stepping Stones to Molecular Literacy activities see: http://molo.concord.org/database/browse/stepping-stones/4)
Thus, from simple concepts of random motion and the stickiness between particles, a sophisticated view of the molecular world emerges. Generations of biology teachers used their eloquence and tons of chalk to convey these ideas. For our students, modeling and visualizing the processes of molecular interactions are only a click away. The Stepping Stones to Molecular Literacy builds a unique progression of understanding. Armed with this foundational understanding, students can take on more complex explorations, all the way to the Central Dogma, and further, to new discoveries in molecular biology.
Boris Berenfeld (boris@concord.org5) is the Principal Investigator of the Molecular Workbench projects and Director of the International Center. Robert Tinker (bob@concord.org6) is President of the Concord Consortium.
Links
Document Location: http://www.highwired.net/publications/newsletter/2006-fall/progressions.html
Last Updated: 12/14/2006
Copyright © 2008, The Concord Consortium. All rights reserved.